The Mainichi Daily News, Oct. 8, 2011
True radiation decontamination still a long way away

This article discusses the daunting, perhaps impossible, challenges of removing radioactive contamination in Japan from buildings, roofs, roads, fields…everywhere.

Excerpts:
[...] “It might make you feel like you’re decontaminating, but there’s a limit to the amount of radioactive cesium that’s caked onto roofs that can be eliminated with high-pressure water cleaners,” says Kunihiro Yamada, a professor of environmental science at Kyoto Seika University. “The water cleaners wash surface dirt off, but then that tainted water goes into sewers and can contaminate rivers, thereby affecting farm goods and seafood. If people in highly populated areas were to begin using water cleaners, we may end up finding people forcing tainted water onto each other.” [...]

[...] “What residents want is not half the exposure to radiation,” says Yamada. “What they want is for a return to levels that allow them to live with peace of mind. Massive amounts of radioactive materials have been spread across wide areas in the ongoing disaster, so we can’t count on the weathering effect. There’s also the possibility that radiation will not only spread, but will start to accumulate in large concentrations in certain places. The half life of cesium 137 is approximately 30 years, but that of cesium 134 is 2 years. What the government has said is the equivalent of saying that they won’t engage in full-fledged decontamination activities.” [...]

[...] Kodama finishes his book, “Naibu hibaku no shinjitu” (The Truth about Internal Exposure), with the following: “We have contaminated our country’s earth, this irreplaceable inheritance from our ancestors that we had been charged with and must pass on to our children. However, if humans are the ones who contaminated it, then we humans should be able to clean it up again.” [...]

Full article at: Thttp://mdn.mainichi.jp/features/news/20111007p2a00m0na018000c.html

At this moment, a powerful typhoon is hitting Japan and expected to pass right over the Fukushima power plant. While CNN refers to the storm’s possible impact on Fukushima–http://edition.cnn.com/2011/09/21/world/asia/japan-typhoon-roke-deaths/?hpt=ias_c2, CBC’s coverage of the evacuation call for 1.3 mio people is silent on it: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/09/20/typhoon-japan.html.

There is reason for serious concern that more radioactivity will be released into water and air by the massive downpour of rain and onslaught of storm on the leaking basements of and ground beneath the damaged reactor buildings. The ground has been destabilized by the earthquake, and reactor building 4 has been leaning as a result. Like the other reactor buildings, it contains a spent fuel pool (SFP) with hundreds of tons of MOX fuel, including highly toxic Plutonium. If the building crumbles, the SPF will go with it, potentially releasing more Plutonium and other radioactive materials. More information and discussion of this is available at www.fairewinds.com.

With the possibility of more radioactive releases in Japan that will be carried here by the jetstream, it is disconcerting to learn that Health Canada intends to stop its air radiation reporting soon. The Japanese government has now hired social media and internet experts to spread government information on the Fukushima disaster. Here in Canada, Canadian mainstream media have conspicuously stayed away from reporting on the Fukushima catastrophe, despite public calls for media attention to this topic.

A major supplier of the international nuclear industry, Germany’s energy giant Siemens, has decided to pull out of the nuclear industry, according to BBC Business News, September 18, 2011. This decision is a direct result of the Fukushima disaster and the German government’s decision to phase out nuclear power in Germany by 2022.
Read the BBC news here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14963575

No radiation detected in West Coast fish
This appears to be good news! However, why are we not told what kind of fish was tested, where, and what the actual readings were? Pacific salmon need to be tested now and into the future as their migration patterns can take them as far as to the northern tip of Japan over their multi-year life span. Was Pacific salmon tested by the CFIA?

CBC News Sept. 19, 2011
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/09/16/bc-no-radiation-west-coast-fish.html

See “Testing and Monitoring” for comprehensive answers by CFIA citizen questions about the recent fish tests.

This is an excellent piece by the Guardian–read it and form your own opinion!

Twenty five years on from Chernobyl, the heated debate on nuclear power remains resistant to cold facts: simply too few are known. But making your own judgements on five key questions will lead to your answer
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/apr/21/chernobyl-nuclear-power-fukushima

As Canadian news media do not seem to take an interest in the fate of the people and environment in Japan post-Fukushima, we have to rely on international media, such as the Guardian, which has provided excellent data journalism and reports on this topic:
“Six months after the multiple meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the streets have been cleared but the psychological damage remains…”http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/09/fukushima-japan-nuclear-disaster-aftermath

Other related stories by the Guardian:

Fukushima six months on: Japanese mark moment earthquake struck
Silent tribute to 20,000 dead and missing as pessimism over recovery and anxiety over radiation remain
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/11/fukushima-six-months-on

Fukushima report shows nuclear power can never be safe and cheap The first “independent” review of the safety failures during Japan’s nuclear disaster reveals some chillingly obvious “lessons” to be learned
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/jun/20/nuclearpower-nuclear-waste

Fukushima nuclear disaster: PM at the time feared Japan would collapse. Naoto Kan said that Tepco had considered abandoning the plant after it was hit by the 11 March tsunami
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/08/fukushima-nuclear-disaster-pm-japan?intcmp=239

Japan Disaster http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/japan-earthquake-and-tsunami

Fukushima spin was Orwellian Emails detailing how the UK government played down Fukushima show just how cosy it is with the nuclear industry http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/01/fukushima-emails-government-nuclear-industry

Citizens across world oppose nuclear power, poll finds. The debate over nuclear energy is fiendishly complex, but one important factor is public opinion, and people in 24 nations across the world oppose it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/jun/23/nuclearpower-nuclear-waste

Nuclear power: If Japan and Germany don’t need it, why does anyone? The world’s third and fourth biggest economies have abandoned plans for new reactors, believing renewables and efficiency can fill the gap. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/may/11/nuclear-renewables-japan-germany

One of the most toxic and dangerous radionuclides is Plutonium, which results from the decay of radioactive Neptunium. It is carcinogenic and deadly in very minute amounts. Until now, we have not had any information on actual levels of Plutonium released at Fukushima. The most recently released data is highly troubling: http://enenews.com/report-76-trillion-becquerels-plutonium-239-released-fukushima-23000-times-higher-previously-announced

One worker reported dead in blast at Marcoule nuclear waste processing site in southern France http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/12/french-nuclear-plant-rocked-explosion

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers